mindofmila

April 16, 2012

Chapter 12: New New Media and the Election of 2008

Filed under: Opinion,School,Writing — by mindofmila @ 12:39 PM

“Through the combination of the new medium of the Web and the old medium of the telephone, mybarackobama.com had created a truly new new medium in which the reader became even more than a writer…I had been trasformed from an occasional reader and writer into an active campaign worker (pg. 181, Levinson).”

“He married the Internet to community organizing (pg. 181, Levinson).”

These two quotes I feel embodied the overall point of the chapter.  The chapter discussed not only how Obama allowed the community of supporters to be able to feel personally connected to him on his campaign, but also how Obama wanted to stay connected with his supporters as well.  The necessity of his Blackberry, email, and blogs all include his needs for feedback and updates from the communities affected by problems he proposed to fix.  Focusing on a personal level is a crucial aspect in connecting with audiences.  If an audience feels included, it will make them more obliged to support and be active for something because they feel personally included and that they matter.  New new media allowed Obama to reach various facets of supporters, as well as keep people updated live with the YouTube streams.  Although there were and are some downfalls, such as sites crashing from too many hits, the new new media forum allows him to stay connected as well as interact with different generations of supporters.  If you can persuade a vast age of audiences to support you, you will have more supporters, lead, and ultimately win a presidential race.

April 9, 2012

“The Story of A Suicide: Two College Roommates, A Webcam, and A Tragedy”

Filed under: School — by mindofmila @ 8:11 PM

Dharun Ravi’s actions, undoubtedly, conveyed that he believed Tyler Clementi to be gay, especially with his Twitter posting.  However, this article did bring to light new evidence that I had previously been unaware of in the case.  Such as that the video was not posted, and that Celmenti was never actually engaged in sexual activity with the other man.  Although I strongly disagree with Ravi’s invasion of privacy in secretly taping his roommate, and intending to do so repeatedly in order to find out if he was gay, I am not sure if he is guilty of absolutely every charge.

Clearly, Ravi wanted to reveal Clementi was, in fact, gay, and his Twitter post ending with, “Yay!” highlights that.  Why would someone be proud to find a man hugging another man?  Why would someone else consider that gay?  On what grounds could Ravi clearly distinguish a “gay” gesture versus a “non-gay” gesture between two men?  Did Ravi actually see the two men “making out?”

Furthermore, what the article also highlights is how the media can exploit anyone, to any degree, even with cartoons.  The media promptly attacked Ravi and his actions, portraying him in such a negative light, as well as with hate from so many angles.  The story truly highlights the power, both positive and negative, of the media.  The “It Gets Better” campaign is definitely a pro, as in it brings awareness and unity to the gay-straight alliance and communities, as shows support and an outlet to let people know they are not alone.  A con could be facts portrayed by huge media outlets, such as CNN, ABC, and even celebrities like Ellen Degeneres, that distort the story, or enhance the negative qualities of it that can lead to others to gear hate towards someone else.

Chapter 11: New, New Media..

Filed under: School — by mindofmila @ 7:55 PM

“But the power that gives all new new media consumers to become producers creates a new kind of noise – a noise deliberately created and posted by a user…to truly and effectively eliminate spam, the new new medium would have to be so heavily controlled as to no longer be a new new medium (pg. 177, Levinson).”

I think this quote truly represents the whole chapter; New new media cannot effectively be controlled without losing a lot of aspects of the freedom of the media/press.  Filters can only contain so much; cyberbullying can be slightly controlled with blocking features, spam features, reporting harmful material features, etc., but the person can still post harmful things to their own page about others.  Similarly, cyberstalking is the same; anyone can simply create a new page, post, etc. to get in touch with someone, and that is a scary thought.  Identity can never be 100% accurate in a lot of new social media networks (i.e. fake celebrity twitters, facebooks, myspaces, etc.).

Furthermore, in the “Twittering” section, had Twitter been so controlled as to exclude and filter certain things, a lot of tweets would not be made public and would not be informative, such as in the Mumbai massacre.  Essentially, new new media provides a crucial forum for communication of all types of messages, good and bad, but you have to use yur better judgement to decipher between what to believe, not believe, support, and not support.

March 28, 2012

“I Am Trayvon Martin”

“I Am Trayvon Martin.”  A phrase that has been broadcasted nation-wide lately, reaching thousands and thousands of supporters.  There is no doubt in my mind that everyone wants justice for the slaying of 17 year-old Trayvon Martin, however, recently, I feel as though many activists and supporters are turning the case into much more than murder.

Granted, racial factors played a key role in Trayvon’s case, as made evident by George Zimmerman’s 911 calls, but there are now a variety of generalizations being made by various ethnic communities about different races.  People are attacking one another, taking the focus off of “Justice For Trayvon” and putting it on “I’m white, I’m black, this group suppressed me, I have to fight fire with fire.”  No, you don’t, as Trayvon’s family made clear, opposing to Minister Mikhal of the Black Panthers, who put a bounty on Zimmerman’s head, saying he and his party will take the law into their own hands in order to have justice for Trayvon.

Gandhi said, “An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.”  I strongly agree with this.  I am not naive, and I will not sit here and say that racism is dead, it’s not.  However, how relevant people make a race in their lives is what constitutes it’s grounds for prominence in today’s society.  If you make clear distinctions and acknowledge differences and stereotypes in a negative way, and reinforce those stereotypes to people around you, they then maintain prevalence because you speak them into truth.

Self-fulfilling prophecy is defined as a prediction or an expectation that comes true simply because one acts as if it were true (Gamble, Gamble. pg. 51).  Pygmalion effect is defined as the principle that we fulfill the expectations of others (Gamble & Gamble).  Simply, if you act a certain way, others will perceive you to be that way.  One must make changes in order to change perceptions of themselves, as well as expectations others have for them.  If you fulfill a societal norm, or stereotype, it will be hard to break that stereotype.  No one first impression can tell you about a person in their entirety, one must break through the layers of that person to see who they are, and not judge merely based on surface appearances/actions.

Times have changed, and although there is still a variety of views, differences on culture, and racial issues, there is one common bond with my generation: to come together, regardless of race, and support equality and justice.

It hurts me to hear how bias people can be, especially on Twitter.  People are constantly tweeting “jokes” about any races, including their own, but do they realize the harm that can do?  Again, speaking something into truth therefore makes it believable.  Everyday, I see, “White people can’t cook.  White people are too picky.  White people have more opportunities than any other race.  I’m surprised this white girl can cook,” or things like, “Damn, black people stay losing.  Black people never get good jobs because they don’t go to school or college.  Black people don’t have as many opportunities as other races.”

This is blasphemy to me; Sorry I’m not sorry.  How can you generalize a single individual based on the color of their skin?  How can you so strongly generalize that how one race raises their child is different and/or to how another race raises their child?  The difference should be how parents conduct their parenting, not what color the parents are.  I have numerous friends, of ALL RACES, that go to school, have good jobs, happy families and homes.  So, to simply come to the conclusion that someone can or cannot, or will or will not have things in life based on their skin color is ridiculous.

If you speak something into to truth, then that is your own fault.  If you believe something is that way, then it will be that way until you decide to change it.  You acknowledge what you believe to be true, but you also have the power to change that by thinking differently.  Some things are inevitable, but many things are able to be changed as long as you have the hope and the willpower to endure and conquer opposition.

I had an African-American tell me that because I am white, I shouldn’t care as much as I do about the Trayvon Martin case; that I wouldn’t understand “their struggle.”  Do I not have morals?  Do I not have a heart?  Do I not have a mind of my own to recognizably distinguish what is right from what is wrong?  I was raised to believe that if you want something, you must truly believe in it, work tirelessly for it, and continue to want better things out of your life.  I was taught to not compare the differences of other people, but to accept them as my own, and to acknowledge diversity as a learning experience.  Expanding the knowledge of cultures expands the mind.

There is a lot to be learned from the Trayvon Martin case; America, regardless of race, is clearly in need of help in all aspects: judicially, racially, socially, and economically.  We get no where as a community of peers and equals if we continue to acknowledge differences in a negative way.  We get no where if we continue to acknowledge and fulfill stereotypes.  We make our own paths for ourselves, we should be our own successors.  What we leave behind, how our generation raises our children, what we teach our peers and children to believe is what will shape our future generations.

“Things are never just black and white, but various shades of gray.” -Nicole Skarbek

March 19, 2012

Chapter 13: Hardware..

Filed under: Uncategorized — by mindofmila @ 7:56 PM

“The iPhone starts to satisfy the longstanding human need to have any and all information, anytime we may want it, wherever we and the information we seek may happen to be (pg. 188, Levinson).”

This quote particularly stuck out to me because it’s true.  It ties the entire logic of the “New Media” course into one sentence: information is always accessible and at our fingertips through our media devices.  Without the portable media devices, we would be unable to report, record, video, photograph, and post information at an up-to-the-minute speed.

In this chapter, he also goes on to describe just how much new media costs us, and makes me wonder if it’s worth it to pay up to $800 for an iPhone (without a plan contract), simply to be able to go on Facebook, Twitter, etc.  There are plenty of cheaper phones and plans that offer texting and call options, without all the extra new media features.  Demand is so high for these feature, that flip phones are almost non-existent, and even pay-as-you-go phones are becoming touch-screen and have data available features.

Another interesting, highlighted point was that cell phones are being used inside the home, more so than home phones.  People keep their cell phones close to them 24 hours a day, because they feel a need to be connected.  So how much are we interacting in our homes if we are always paying attention to our phones?  Using them in bed, doing homework, in the library, while cooking, etc.  Will the need for home phones and landlines be a distant memory in the future for our generation?  Besides high roaming and long distance rates for cell phones, that seems to be the only thing I could think of being an issue in removing landlines from homes.

Mini Task 3

Filed under: Opinion,School,Writing — by mindofmila @ 6:07 PM

3.18.12:

Day one of mini-task 3 seemed to be relatively easy…until I actually had to sit down and do my homework.  I had decided to give up using my laptop unless it was to write a paper for school, or to take notes in class.  The second I sat down to do my homework and opened my laptop, I realized that my iTunes automatically opened and started playing music.  I went to shut down the application, and before I could even shut it down, my iPhoto opened because my iPhone was plugged into my laptop to charge.  This task is going to be a lot harder than I thought.  I have my cell phone, but the format settings on the browser are vastly different, and take a lot longer to load when I go to check my Regis email, etc.  Uploading photos from St. Patrick’s Day to Facebook took my a significantly longer amount of time because I had to do them one at a time from my phone, instead of being able to upload many at once.  The temptation to wonder to different websites, and even listen to music via my laptop while doing homework proved to be challenging; I’m curious to see how the rest of the week plays out…

3.19.12

Day two, vastly harder to not use my laptop leisurely in class.  Using it to solely take notes is so hard when you would rather be elsewhere.  Having my iPhone makes things easier, but like I said, the formatting of the browser makes it impossible to view some media or content on certain websites.  Even in viewing the video for our New Media class, I had to actually use my laptop browser to view it because it said the video was not “mobile accessible” yet.  I have done well without using my laptop except for homework and note-taking purposes, but using the internet on a laptop is so much easier, especially in checking Regis email.  My laptop remembers the websites at its “Favorites” page, whereas in my phone, I have to type out the whole link, waiting for each page to download.  Slightly annoying, as I find it takes double the time, especially when using the Regis Campus wi-fi.  It’s also harder to get away with wandering away to other websites in classes since I would have to use my phone.  Sigh..day three tomorrow.  Let’s see how well that goes.

3.20.12

Today, I barely had time at all to even think about using my laptop at all.  Even in class, I was occupied by discussions and interactive work.  It’s usually only during lectures where students are not really participating that I find myself wanting to wander off on my laptop.  I finished all my homework during work, so I really I had all the time I wanted to utilize my afternoon and evening.  The only hard part about giving up my laptop is the homework and blogging aspect.  I tried to refrain from using my laptop to write these posts, but I hate the formatting of the WordPress app on my iPhone.  It is far easier to write a post from my laptop, but the temptation to check Facebook, open my iTunes, etc. still lingers there.

3.21.12

So, today I am doing the unthinkable and actually writing this post from my cell phone.  After using my laptop for homework earlier, I caved and found myself wandering on to Facebook.  Sometimes, I just need a leisurely break from my work and then go back to it to recollect my thoughts.  My phone was going off with notifications on a status I had written earlier, and I guess it was just easier to check on my laptop rather that use my phone because it takes longer to load on my phone with the Facebook app.  I then, however, turned off my computer completely.  I think it is easier to refrain from using social media when your wi-fi is turned off, so that’s what I did.  Turning my wi-fi off makes me think twice when I go back to finish my homework, because if I’m tempted, I stop myself and realize, “oh yeah, I can’t check that on here right now.”  The temptation isn’t that bad though, since I am literally connected to everything through my iPhone.  For music, I have Pandora, for social media, I have Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram; there is literally an app for anything I feel I would need to be entertained or to research.

3.22.12

I decided to add on to my mini-task 3 by challenging myself further by going without using apps on my cell phone besides texting.  I even limited that to reading texts, but replying by calling instead of texting back unless it was absolutely necessary to text the person.  It was pretty challenging at first, but my goal is to balance my social networking with my social interaction in person.  Using my iPhone safari internet versus using my laptop internet is relatively hard, considering it takes a considerable amount of time for things to load, but it is definitely manageable.

3.23.12

Today was a little harder for me since I took the use of my cell phone apps away.  I used my laptop to do some homework while I was at work, but realized there was no available wi-fi at my job, so I couldn’t connect my laptop to do research.  This was the first time I had been somewhere where there was no free wi-fi available.  And I was really surprised.  I’m not used to being restricted, and therefore, had to use my phone for internet.  My homework took SO LONG to finish because I had to google everything and research it, wait for it to load, and then would have to use the back browser instead of being able to have multiple windows up.  It was my first real encounter with a serious issue for me during this mini-task.

3.24.12

Today was the last day of the mini-task, and I must say, after putting things in perspective, I would be really lost in school without the help of my laptop.  Writing papers or taking notes would be nearly impossible since most professors don’t allow cell phone use in class, and it takes a lot longer to use touch screen.  My laptop is something I generally take for granted, because I can easily edit and upload photos, access numerous sites at once, and write freely in as many windows open as I desire.  Having accessible free wi-fi is essential too.  Although the mini-task was not as difficult as the previous mini-tasks, I tried to challenge myself and also realized it would be so difficult not to have a laptop.  I would have to travel to the library that is only open certain hours in order to get work done, and that is extremely hard considering my tightly packed schedule.

March 9, 2012

Chapter 6: MySpace & Chapter 7: Facebook..

The MySpace chapter definitely brought back some memories of 2005-2006, when I first created my MySpace page.  Now, to me at least, it is nonexistent.  I don’t even remember the last time I logged into my MySpace account, or what my login and password are.  A part I found particularly interesting was the “irresistable Appeal of ‘Friends’” section of the chapter.  MySpace essentially, when I was starting to use it, was for people of all ages, and a way to interact.  The more “friends” you had on MySpace, the “better” your page was.  ”Friends” is a term used loosely when referencing MySpace.  You did not necessarily know the people who were friending you, or who you were friending.  Most of the time, in my experiences, it was based on page content, and how attractive the person was.  Whereas Facebook was created for only college students, and it was more of friending people who you know, rather than strangers.

MySpace and Facebook are both networking tools, but serve different functions.  MySpace and Facebook both allow content, pictures, music, movies, etc. to be shared, both have the option of being public or private, and both also are networks for friends, but also geared towards making new friends, and developing new interests.

Facebook seems to be more private, more socially inclined than MySpace.  Although both pages provide spaces for direct messages, comments, picture comments, and friend listings, Facebook is based around college students, and keeping in touch with those you already know and are familiar with.  It also allows those in similar job, college/student networks to find each other and interact.  Whereas MySpace is more of a completely open forum that serves as somewhat of a dating site.  Pictures and content are open, where you write your own mini-autobiography.  Facebook is more personalized, in sectioning every area of interest: i.e. movies, television, novels, interests, quotes, religion, interested in, sex, birthdate, etc.  Over time, MySpace has somewhat evolved to be more like Facebook, but does not hold the same power it once did in society now.

With the “groups” on Facebook, it also allows for further networking and direct communication with people inside that network/group.  You can comment on a group’s wall, or contact and message a member of that group directly, whereas MySpace it is not as accessible.  Facebook also allows up to the minute updates (status updates) that are interactive – MySpace does not offer that feature.  I think it closely is intertwined with the human need for acceptance and popularity.  Humans are naturally nosey, as well as opinionated.  So with Facebook, you can essentially create a mini-blog within your newsfeed.  Facebook also allows for relationships to be maintained with old friends, family and friends that live far away, and as a forum for communication for those in different time zones, and I think the relevance of Facebook makes it that much easier for those to connect since the MySpace era is seemingly over.

Facebook allows for more information to be shared to a wider variety of audiences. MySpace simply is a forum that, to me, has turned into a dating website.  It does make me wonder if Twitter is now going to turn Facebook into MySpace.  Where will Twitter be in a few years?  Will Facebook shut down or lose subscribers?  Where will MySpace be in a few years?  Does it depend on regions of the country or age as to who uses what?

March 7, 2012

Stop Kony 2012..

Everyone needs to make themselves aware;  Anyone can contribute. Please take the time to watch this video and educate yourself, make yourself aware of just how good your life is.  Donate if you can..

February 26, 2012

“Stop And Hear The Music”

Filed under: Uncategorized — by mindofmila @ 11:20 PM

A prime example of just how fast-paced the world is today.  So often, my generation has been consumed by new and new new media; Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, texting..but how much of our time is being focused on the present?  On enjoying the moment?  How many times do we focus so much so on being 10 steps ahead, or on other things, that truly valuing the here and now?

This video/experiment truly embodies how as we grow, we centralize our focus on distractions, rather than to enjoy our surroundings; rather than to appreciate the present, the beauty of the world that we so often block out.

Being consumed by forms of media can be a difficult habit to break, but even just turning your phone on silent while with friends, with family, it can dramatically change how you view the world, and how you interact with those around you..

 

Huffington Post:

“A man sat at a metro station in Washington DC and started to play the violin; it was a cold January morning. He played six Bach pieces for about 45 minutes. During that time, since it was rush hour, it was calculated that thousands of people went through the station, most of them on their way to work.

Three minutes went by and a middle aged man noticed there was musician playing. He slowed his pace and stopped for a few seconds and then hurried up to meet his schedule.

A minute later, the violinist received his first dollar tip: a woman threw the money in the till and without stopping continued to walk.

A few minutes later, someone leaned against the wall to listen to him, but the man looked at his watch and started to walk again. Clearly he was late for work.

The one who paid the most attention was a 3 year old boy. His mother tagged him along, hurried but the kid stopped to look at the violinist. Finally the mother pushed hard and the child continued to walk turning his head all the time. This action was repeated by several other children. All the parents, without exception, forced them to move on.

In the 45 minutes the musician played, only 6 people stopped and stayed for a while. About 20 gave him money but continued to walk their normal pace. He collected $32. When he finished playing and silence took over, no one noticed it. No one applauded, nor was there any recognition.

No one knew this but the violinist was Joshua Bell, one of the best musicians in the world. He played one of the most intricate pieces ever written with a violin worth $3.5 million dollars.

Two days before his playing in the subway, Joshua Bell sold out at a theater in Boston and the seats average $100.

This is a real story. Joshua Bell playing incognito in the metro station was organized by the Washington Post as part of an social experiment about perception, taste and priorities of people. The outlines were: in a commonplace environment at an inappropriate hour: Do we perceive beauty? Do we stop to appreciate it? Do we recognize the talent in an unexpected context?

One of the possible conclusions from this experience could be:

If we do not have a moment to stop and listen to one of the best musicians in the world playing the best music ever written, how many other things are we missing?”

 

February 22, 2012

Is Google Making Us Stupid?

Filed under: Uncategorized — by mindofmila @ 10:26 PM

In this article, I completely agreed with Nicholas Carr; I, too, have the shortest attention span ever when it comes to textbooks, books for classes, or long articles.  I find myself skimming, rather than trying to read deeply into the passages and articles.  As Carr stated, “Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle…”, and I fully understand what he is saying.  I noticed that as I have gotten older and have had assignments, that the articles or books I can skim, I will.  Because people are so consumed with “not having enough time” or having “too much work,” many are always moving, working, doing, and do not take time to completely absorb themselves in much anymore.  I also strongly believe that because the internet provides links, after links, after links, that anything is easily accessible, but it also provides as a distraction;  Half-way through an article online, there are ads, links to other links, pop-up ads, etc.  It makes it nearly impossible to focus solely on the content of the article.

“…media are not just passive channels of information. They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles.”

 

Next Page »

Theme: Toni. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,457 other followers